Writing is not a thought experiment

No happy endings, Jeanette Winterson said on Monday night during her reading at Brookline Booksmith. No happy endings because endings come in three flavors: Revenge; Tragedy; Forgiveness.

Revenge and tragic endings are often entwined, she said, and endings that result in forgiveness lets the reader believe that the story moves forward and beyond the words on the page. You (or some or all of the fictional characters) forgive yourself (themselves). That’s the way an ending of forgiveness works, which could give the reader a sense of happiness.

But no happy endings.

She’s haunted by books, she said, as if she lives in Dracula’s castle. Some texts, she said, you swallow. And these books are like pearls dissolved in glasses of wine. If you drink such pearl-infused wine, you become part pearl. Similarly, consume one of these books, and you become part of that book. Or that book becomes part of you.

About these ads

One comment on “Writing is not a thought experiment

  1. creativenoodling
    March 22, 2012

    “like pearls dissolved in glasses of wine”… That’s one of those stick-with-you-think-about-over-and-over lines. The entire last paragraph of this will running through my head for a while. Thank you for posting!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on March 22, 2012 by and tagged , , , , , , , , .

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 844 other followers


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 844 other followers

%d bloggers like this: